Neural Mechanisms for Dual-Process Reasoning: Evidence from the Belief-Bias Effect
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recent neuroimaging studies have increasingly focused on the neural mechanisms of human deductive reasoning (see Goel, 2006 for recent review). Deductive reasoning is the cognitive process of drawing valid conclusions from a given set of premises. Although it should be performed independently of prior knowledge and intuitive beliefs, actual human reasoning often relies on them. Sometimes such beliefs provide valid solutions to problems, though they can also bias our judgment. This tendency toward bias in human reasoning has been experimentally studied through the demonstration of belief-bias effect in syllogistic reasoning (De Neys, 2006a, 2006b; Tsujii et al., 2006).
منابع مشابه
Cognitive Style and Auditor's judgment: Does Cognitive Style mitigate the Impact of recency bias on the auditors’ belief revision process?
Abstract: The purpose of the present study is two-dimensional. First, provide more evidence of the effects of information order on auditors' beliefs, and secondly, examine whether auditors vary their beliefs in different cognitive styles. These goals were achieved through the use of experienced professional auditors. To determine the effects of information sequence, Hogarth and Einhorn’s belie...
متن کاملUsing forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
In deductive reasoning, believable conclusions are more likely to be accepted regardless of their validity. Although many theories argue that this belief bias reflects a change in the quality of reasoning, distinguishing qualitative changes from simple response biases can be difficult (Dube, Rotello, & Heit, 2010). We introduced a novel procedure that controls for response bias. In Experiments ...
متن کاملBelief-Logic Conflict Resolution 1 Running Head: BELIEF-LOGIC CONFLICT RESOLUTION Belief-Logic Conflict Resolution in Syllogistic Reasoning: Inspection-Time Evidence for a Parallel-Process Model
An experiment is reported examining dual-process models of belief bias in syllogistic reasoning using a problem complexity manipulation and an inspection-time method to monitor processing latencies for premises and conclusions. Endorsement rates indicated increased belief-bias on complex problems, a finding that runs counter to the “belief-first” selective scrutiny model, but which is consisten...
متن کاملRunning head: ACTIVATION LEVEL AND BELIEF BIAS
Reference: Banks, A.P. (2013). The influence of activation level on belief bias in relational reasoning. Activation level and belief bias 2 Abstract A novel explanation of belief bias in relational reasoning is presented based on the role of working memory and retrieval in deductive reasoning, and the influence of prior knowledge on this process. It is proposed that belief bias is caused by the...
متن کاملBelief-based and analytic processing in transitive inference depends on premise integration difficulty.
Three experiments investigated belief-based versus analytic processing in transitive inference. Belief-based and analytic processing were inferred from conclusion acceptance rates for problems with conclusions that were either valid or invalid and believable or unbelievable. Premise integration difficulty was manipulated by varying premise integration time (Experiment 1), premise presentation o...
متن کامل